Moving everything into one place is only part of the job.
More than one environment leaves you with decisions about Jira, Confluence, users, apps, data, and competing ways of working. I help you decide what to keep, what to consolidate, and how to deliver the agreed changes with a clear plan for the people who depend on them.
For the IT leader holding more than one Atlassian environment.
The trigger varies. The decisions do not.
Two companies, two platforms, one operating model still to agree.
Instances that grew up separately in different teams or business units.
The org chart changed; the platforms still reflect the old one.
The migration is booked, and the real work turns out to be deciding what merges.
Work moving out of a competing system and into Atlassian for good.
I bring experience integrating systems across five acquisitions. That is the hardest version of this work, on a deadline someone else set. The same decisions apply when the trigger is less dramatic.
Make the decisions before they become cutover problems.
Discover the environments
Understand users, products, apps, integrations, permissions, and data in the agreed scope.
Define the destination
Decide what joins the shared platform, what stays separate, and what can be retired.
Plan the transition
Set out migration approach, validation, communications, dependencies, and recovery arrangements appropriate to the scope.
Deliver and hand over
Execute the agreed changes, validate critical workflows, and document ongoing ownership.
The decision, not the assumption.
For each product, app, and workflow across every environment in scope, we make one of three calls.
A necessary difference, with an owner and a reason.
Duplication that standardization would remove.
No longer used, or replaced by the destination.
Teams joining a shared platform do not automatically need identical workflows. Some differences are useful; others create more work. I work with your owners to distinguish necessary differences from duplication, so standardization has an operational reason behind it.
No. The target arrangement should reflect business needs, access requirements, dependencies, and cost. Consolidation is a decision to make, not an assumption.
Yes. Often the consolidation is the reason the migration is hard. Apps, automation, data, and integration compatibility need assessment before the migration approach is committed.
If acquisitions, reorganizations, or new business units keep producing environments to absorb, we can include a reusable playbook and discuss ongoing support.
More than one Atlassian environment, and a decision to make about it?